Actually the only one coming off angry right now seems to be you, or at least you're responding defensively in a way that doesn't seem productive. No one on this post is angry, and no one here is posting angrily in any way, shape, or form.

If you're referring to other mediums, please clarify--if it's to the anon post, for one, that's not here, and therefore shouldn't be listed. And honestly, in that case, and in those circumstances, it's wholly justified--as stated in my original post here, it's the lack of communication that is seriously frustrating as it's a lack of consideration. If people are upset at not being contacted or tagged to, they can be if they feel that need to--it shouldn't affect the people that aren't tagging them at all, because it is justified in those scenarios only. The people not being tagged to should not have to adjust behavior to gain tags, which is how you're coming off in your explanation.

This, however, is perpetuating the us versus them mentality, and I don't like feeding into that.

The canonmate argument that you stated is, to use your own words, bullshit itself, and I'm not going to argue with you on it.

You said very slow so I took it as it was. In your explanation that you've just given, I wholly agree with you, though. As I've said elsewhere and on the suggestion post--if it doesn't affect others, I don't mind. It's when the person is in a thread with others already and vanish for days to weeks that is the problem.

It's really not about the activity at all, which, again, I said in my original post. It's about the lack of consideration and communication.