ext_24919 ([identity profile] burningvigor.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] damned_lounge2011-09-26 07:14 pm
Entry tags:

Activity Check Discussion Post + Contact List Update

Hello, everyone!

While the game has been trucking along pretty nicely (I hope the military arc has been enjoyable for most of you!), recently there's been a lot of talk about people's waning activity. I do think that Damned is a place where you can afford to be slow at times, where you don't have to post to every shift -- this isn't meant to discourage people who aren't lightning taggers like some of us. It's already been mentioned a number of times, but there's little I can do as a mod to make people post faster, and yet there are a few changes that can be made to possibly work through this problem. I definitely want to encourage people to put their all into the game when possible and to play out some awesome plots, so here goes.

This issue was brought up over on the suggestions post, so this is mainly just meant to be a continuation of that. It was mentioned there that this is something that should be talked about by the game as a whole, and so this post is basically an open forum for people to give their thoughts and talk things out. Whether you're one of the people who's frustrated or someone who is on the slow side and looking to explain your side of things, feel free to reply and comment around!

The two solutions which have been brought up are as follows:

a) changing the requirements for the activity check
b) adding a "Posting Speed" section to the plot post form

The second option there would mainly be a way for people to know from the start what to expect from potential thread partners. It's not much of a change, but it would allow an open line of communication to be present from the start.

Changing the Activity Check requirements is something that is going to require some more thought, and so I'd like to start by polling you all on if you think it's something that needs to be revised.

[Poll #1781912]

So go ahead and fill that out, reply here with your thoughts, and we'll see what we can do about this! I'm sorry there's not more I can do, but hopefully this is a step in the right direction.

Additionally, some changes have been made to the Contact List in order to make communication easier for everyone. There's been a spot added for people to list their plurk names if they wish. It's in no way required, but if you are open to people contacting you/conversing with you through plurk then please feel free to list it. More importantly, a Preferred Method of Contact section has been added so that other players can know how you would like to be contacted. I'd like to ask for everyone to respond to the contact list with their response to that section if possible! Thanks a lot for reading all this, and have a nice night, everyone.
ofthemotions: (Default)

[personal profile] ofthemotions 2011-09-27 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
Actually the only one coming off angry right now seems to be you, or at least you're responding defensively in a way that doesn't seem productive. No one on this post is angry, and no one here is posting angrily in any way, shape, or form.

If you're referring to other mediums, please clarify--if it's to the anon post, for one, that's not here, and therefore shouldn't be listed. And honestly, in that case, and in those circumstances, it's wholly justified--as stated in my original post here, it's the lack of communication that is seriously frustrating as it's a lack of consideration. If people are upset at not being contacted or tagged to, they can be if they feel that need to--it shouldn't affect the people that aren't tagging them at all, because it is justified in those scenarios only. The people not being tagged to should not have to adjust behavior to gain tags, which is how you're coming off in your explanation.

This, however, is perpetuating the us versus them mentality, and I don't like feeding into that.

The canonmate argument that you stated is, to use your own words, bullshit itself, and I'm not going to argue with you on it.

You said very slow so I took it as it was. In your explanation that you've just given, I wholly agree with you, though. As I've said elsewhere and on the suggestion post--if it doesn't affect others, I don't mind. It's when the person is in a thread with others already and vanish for days to weeks that is the problem.

It's really not about the activity at all, which, again, I said in my original post. It's about the lack of consideration and communication.